|
Misconception (from Likert — all FALSE)
|
Per 3A (n=17)
|
Per 6A (n=14)
|
Per 7A (n=9)
|
M1: "Weather and climate are the same thing." Correct: Weather=short-term; Climate=30-yr avg
|
|
|
|
M2: "Cold air rises and warm air sinks." Correct: Cold air is denser — it sinks/wedges under warm
|
|
|
|
M3: "Seasons are caused by Earth's distance from
the Sun." Correct: Seasons = axial tilt (23.5°), not distance
|
|
|
|
M4: "Rain only happens when a cold front passes
through." Correct: Warm fronts, stationary fronts, convection also cause
rain
|
|
|
|
M5: "Weather forecasts are just educated
guesses." Correct: NWP models use real data; 24-hr accuracy ~90%
|
|
|
|
|
Vocab gap — note which term:
|
|
|
|
|
Off-task / incomplete
|
|
|
|
PART 1 SYNTHESIS (D1) — Red Flags:
PART 2 CUMULATIVE (D2) — Circulation:
PART 3 MISCONCEPTION (D2) — Persistence:
MANUAL GRADING — Q2, Q4, Q5 noted:
MANUAL GRADING — AQ3, BQ3, CQ3:
MANUAL GRADING — DQ3, DQ4 noted:
| Type |
Students |
Priority |
| Vocab Gap |
|
HML
|
| Misconception |
|
HML
|
| Procedural Error |
|
HML
|
| Incomplete Mechanism |
|
HML
|
| Time |
Component |
Teacher Action |
KEPT |
| 0–5 |
Opening Routine |
Attendance. Chromebooks + worksheet. "Today: review Part 1 (Form
2) + spiral stations. Tomorrow: Cumulative Assessment."
|
2 |
| 5–13 |
2/2/2 Cycle #1 — Opening |
EW 2 min: "What do you
know about air masses + prediction?"
TT 4 min (switch@2): "I
think this content works by ___ because ___."
CC 2 min: partner reports.
|
13
|
| 13–38 |
Part 1: Synthesis (20 pts, Form 2) |
Navigate to Form 2. 3-Lap DNPG: Q2, Q4, Q5 (rubrics P3).
EW Worksheet Part 1 notes.
Watch for red flags — record on P1.
|
15
|
| 38–63 |
Spiral Review Stations (4 stations × ~6 min)
|
Rotate groups: A=C3 climate/greenhouse, B=C4 human impact/ocean,
C=C5W1 air masses/fronts, D=C5W2 prediction/climate vs weather.
Review cards + self-check sheets. Circulate to check station
engagement.
|
124
|
| 63–73 |
DI: Assessment Prep |
Key review: (1) Air mass classification (mT/cP/mP/cT). (2) Front
formation — density drives it. (3) Data patterns (falling
pressure, wind shift, humidity rise). (4) Integration: data → air
mass → prediction.
TT mid-DI: "Use 'source
region,' 'density,' 'front' in one sentence." Misconception traps
(see P5).
|
13
|
| 73–75 |
Day 1 Closing |
Review assessment format + expectations. Test-taking strategy:
show reasoning. Q&A. Preview Day 2. Chromebooks closed.
|
26
|
| Time |
Component |
Teacher Action |
KEPT |
| 0–5 |
Opening Routine |
Attendance. Distribute scratch paper. "Today: Part 2 (Form 4, Sec
A–D, 40 pts) → Part 3 (Form 3, 20 pts) → Self-Assessment Exit
(Form 5, 8 pts). Independent — no partner discussion."
|
2 |
| 5–40 |
Part 2: Cumulative Assessment (40 pts, Form 4)
|
Proctoring laps: DNPG checkpoints — AQ3, BQ3, CQ3, DQ3, DQ4
(rubrics P4). Watch red flags by section. Walk silently. Note
initials for manual grading priority. No assistance with content.
EW Independent throughout.
|
15
|
| 40–55 |
Part 3: Misconception Check (20 pts, Form 3)
|
"Navigate to Form 3. Independent." Circulate — record which
misconceptions are being missed on P1 tracker (M1–M5).
Auto-graded; no answer assistance.
EW Independent.
|
15
|
| 55–63 |
Form 5: Self-Assessment Exit (8 pts) |
"Navigate to Form 5. Rate your understanding of each learning
target (W1–W4) honestly." Individual.
EW
|
45
|
| 63–68 |
2/2/2 Cycle #2 — Synthesis |
EW 1 min: "One thing that
changed your thinking this cycle."
TT 2 min: "My thinking
changed because I learned ___."
CC 2 min: partner reports.
|
34
|
| 68–75 |
Closing + Debrief Prep |
Collect worksheets. Preview Cycle 6. Shout-outs for growth. After
dismissal: note priority manual grading items (Q2, Q4, Q5, DQ3,
DQ4) from P1 tracker.
|
256
|
EW Everybody Writes
TT Turn & Talk
CC Cold Call
SJ Stop & Jot
KEPT: 1Content
2Culture
3Facilitation
4Ownership
5Data
6Beyond
GRADING NOTE: Form 2 manually graded items: Q2 (4 pts)
+ Q4 (4 pts) + Q5/[INTEGRATION+SEP-4] (4 pts) = 12 pts. Grade within 24
hrs. Priority: Q5 first (DOK-3, cross-week integration). See grading
timeline P7.
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
Explains HOW air mass type helps interpret data + specific example
(e.g., rising humidity + mT = Gulf moisture) + vocabulary (mT, cP,
data interpretation)
|
|
3
|
Good explanation with at least one specific example; minor
vocabulary gap
|
|
1–2
|
Basic connection or vague — states that air masses help interpret
data without explaining mechanism
|
EXEMPLAR (4):
"Knowing it's an mT air mass means rising temperature + humidity
isn't random — it's Gulf air bringing moisture and energy. If that mT
meets a cP air mass, expect severe weather at the front boundary.
Without knowing air mass type, the data just says 'getting warmer and
more humid' but doesn't tell you WHAT comes next."
RED FLAG:
"Air mass types help you understand the data" — without explaining
HOW or giving a specific example. → Prompt: "Give me one example: if
you see rising humidity and you know the air mass is mT, what
specifically does that predict?"
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
≥3 clear sequential steps + specific data sources (pressure, temp,
radar) + W1 (air masses/fronts) AND W2 (data collection/patterns)
explicitly integrated
|
|
3
|
3 steps with partial integration — references either W1 or W2
concepts but not both explicitly
|
|
1–2
|
Fewer than 3 steps, or lists steps without mentioning air
masses/fronts (W1) or specific data patterns (W2)
|
EXEMPLAR (4):
Step 1: Collect data from barometers, radar, satellites (W2). Step 2:
Identify patterns — falling pressure, wind shift, humidity rise (W2).
Step 3: Identify air masses and frontal boundaries from wind direction
+ temperature gradient (W1). Step 4: Apply air mass properties to
predict changes — cP approaching = clear/cold/dry; cold front = rapid
temp drop + wind shift (W1). "W2 data shows what's happening NOW; W1
air mass knowledge predicts what happens NEXT."
RED FLAG:
"Collect data, look at it, and predict" — without specific steps,
data sources, or integration of air mass/front knowledge. → Prompt:
"How does knowing the air mass type change what you predict? That's
the W1 integration."
Scenario: Pressure 30.1"→29.6" (falling), Temp
55°F→48°F, Wind S 10mph→NW 25mph, Humidity 65%→85%
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
Identifies cold front passage + cites ≥2 specific data points as
evidence + predicts post-front conditions + uses both W1 (air mass
identity) and W2 (data patterns) vocabulary
|
|
3
|
Identifies cold front with 2 data pieces as evidence; prediction
present but missing air mass identity (cP/mT)
|
|
1–2
|
Partial identification — may notice "cold" without identifying front
type; or no prediction of next phase
|
EXEMPLAR (4):
"Cold front is passing. Evidence: Wind shift S→NW (THE classic cold
front signature), falling pressure (0.5" in 12 hrs), temp drop (mT
being replaced by cP). mT air was in place (warm temps, south winds,
rising humidity at frontal boundary). cP air is now moving in (NW
winds, falling temp). PREDICTION next 6–12 hrs: precipitation ending,
continued temp fall to 40–42°F, pressure rising, skies clearing as dry
cP air settles in."
RED FLAG:
Does not connect W1 concepts (which air masses, why they behave
differently) with W2 data patterns (specific evidence for front
passage). Misses wind shift significance — the S→NW shift is the
definitive cold front indicator. → Prompt: "What does the wind shift
from S to NW tell you about which air mass is replacing which?"
GRADING NOTE: Form 4 manual items: AQ3 (4 pts) + BQ3 (4
pts) + CQ3 (4 pts) + DQ3 (4 pts) + DQ4 (3 pts) = 19 pts. Grade Sections
D first (highest DOK). Full exemplars in lesson-plan.md.
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
Uses all 4 vocab terms correctly (maritime, continental, humidity,
evaporation) + explains mechanism (ocean provides evaporation →
humidity) + contrasts both environments
|
|
3
|
Uses 3–4 terms; explains one environment clearly but contrast is
incomplete
|
|
1–2
|
"Ocean air is wet, land air is dry" — no mechanism or vocabulary
|
KEY (4): Maritime (m) forms over ocean → high evaporation → high humidity.
Continental (c) forms over land → limited evaporation → dry. "The
ocean is a continuous water source; land has limited water. Therefore
maritime = humid, continental = dry."
RED FLAG: "Ocean air is wet / land air is dry" — no evaporation mechanism. →
"Why does the ocean make air humid? What process is happening?"
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
All 3 phases + specific elements per phase (temp, pressure, wind,
clouds, precip) in at least 2 of the 3 phases
|
|
3
|
All 3 phases present with some specifics; one phase may be vague
|
|
1–2
|
"Before: warm. During: rain. After: cold." — missing specific
elements or phases
|
KEY (4): BEFORE: Slowly falling pressure, rising humidity, south winds,
increasing clouds. DURING: Rapid temp drop 10–20°F/hr, wind shifts
SW→NW, heavy rain/storms, pressure minimum. AFTER: Clearing, cold and
stable (cP), pressure rising, NW winds decreasing, humidity
dropping.
RED FLAG: Missing one of the 3 phases, or describes only 1 weather variable per
phase. → "What is happening to pressure, wind, and temperature in each
phase?"
Data: 6AM: 45°F, 30.2", S 8mph → 12PM: 52°F, 29.9", SW
15mph → 6PM: 48°F, 29.5", W 22mph
|
Score
|
Criteria
|
|
4
|
≥2 named patterns + data citations + prediction for next 6 hrs with
reasoning (e.g., front just passed → continued cooling, rising
pressure)
|
|
3
|
2 patterns with data + prediction present but reasoning is brief
|
|
1–2
|
"Pressure is falling so it will rain" — 1 pattern, no cross-variable
reasoning
|
KEY (4): Pattern 1: Steadily falling pressure (30.2"→29.5" = 0.7" drop) =
strong low approaching. Pattern 2: Clockwise wind shift (S→SW→W =
veering) = cold front passage. Pattern 3: Temp rise then fall
(45°→52°→48°) = warm sector then cold air advection. Prediction: Front
just passed; next 6 hrs: temp continues falling to ~40°F, NW winds,
pressure begins rising, skies clearing.
RED FLAG: Sees data points but not patterns/trends. → "Look at pressure across
all three time points — is it going up, down, or steady? That's a
pattern."
Scenario: 42°F, 29.7" falling, 80% humidity, NW
18mph, cP moving in, precipitation band 80 mi W moving E at 20 mph
KEY (4): Timing: 80 mi / 20 mph = 4 hrs → arrives 6PM. Precip: Rain at 6PM
changing to snow ~8–9PM as temp falls through 32°F (cP air). Temp:
42°F → 38°F (6PM) → 32°F (10PM). Wind: NW 20–25 mph, gusts to 35
mph during precip. Pressure: falling to ~29.4" by 8–9PM then
rising.
RED FLAG: "Snow is coming" — no timing calculation (distance/speed) or
temperature reasoning. → "When will the precipitation arrive? How
do you calculate that?"
KEY (3): TWO valid scientific reasons: (1) Storm track error — predicted
storm passed south but actual track was 50 mi north, bringing city
into precipitation zone. (2) Unexpected intensification — model
underestimated moisture/wind shear; storm developed faster than
predicted. (Other valid: timing error, model initialization error
from poor-quality upstream data.)
RED FLAG: "The meteorologist made a mistake" — blames human error instead
of atmospheric/scientific limitations. → "What atmospheric
variable was harder to predict — and why?"
TIMER: 5 minAttendance + materials check + overview of Week 3 structure
SAY (Opening): "Good morning scholars.
Chromebooks out but closed. Today is Day 1 of our assessment week.
[Attendance.] Today we'll review and connect everything from Weeks 1 and
2 — air masses, fronts, data patterns, and weather prediction. Tomorrow
is the cumulative assessment. Today is preparation and synthesis."
TIMER: 2 minPre-Write #1 — Phenomenon section: "Your initial thinking" box
SAY:
EW "In your phenomenon box,
write: what do you ALREADY know from Weeks 1 and 2? Write your initial
thinking — 2 minutes, silent writing." [Circulate — note interesting
predictions for cold call.]
TIMER: 4 minTurn & Talk #1 — Switch at 2 min
SAY:
TT "Stem: 'I think this week's
content works by ___ because ___.' Partner A first — 2 minutes. [BEEP]
Switch — Partner B."
TIMER: 2 minCold Call #1 — Partner reports
SAY:
CC "[Name], what did YOUR
PARTNER predict? [Follow-up:] What evidence supported their thinking?"
Accept all reasonable predictions at this stage.
SAY (Launch): "Open Form 2 — Synthesis
Review. You have 25 minutes. This connects Week 1 air masses with Week 2
data collection and prediction. Sentence starters are on your worksheet.
Timer starts now."
LOOK FOR (Q2): Student attempting
to connect air mass knowledge to data interpretation — even a partial
sentence counts as started. Prompt if blank: "Knowing the air mass
type helps because…"
DNPG Q2 — IF blank:
"I don't know how to start."
"Write this: 'Knowing the air mass type helps because...' — then
fill in one thing from Week 1 about mT or cP air. Just one
sentence gets you started."
LOOK FOR (Q4): At least 3 steps in
forecast process AND terms: data collection, pattern recognition, air
masses. "First, the meteorologist…" starter used.
DNPG Q4 — IF only 1–2 vague steps:
"Collect data and predict."
"You have two steps — what happens BETWEEN collecting data and
predicting? What does the meteorologist DO with the data? Add one
step that uses Week 1 concepts."
LOOK FOR (Q5):
Wind shift from S to NW identified as cold front signature. "The data
shows a cold front because…" used.
DNPG Q5 — IF missing wind shift:
"The pressure is falling so weather is coming."
"Pressure fall is one clue — what does the wind DIRECTION change
tell you? South to NW wind shift is the specific cold front
signature. Add that to your response."
LOOK FOR: Q2 has specific example
(mT or cP scenario with prediction). Q4 has 3+ steps integrating W1
& W2 concepts. Q5 identifies cold front AND predicts next phase
with cP air mass behavior.
RED FLAG (Q5):
Identifies event but no Week 1 air mass connection.
"You've identified the data pattern from Week 2 — now add the Week
1 layer: which air mass is arriving, and what does that tell you
about the NEXT 24 hours?"
SAY (Station Setup): "Form 2 pencils
down. Groups of 3–4 — move to your assigned station. Each station has
review cards and practice problems with a self-check answer sheet. 6
minutes per station. I'll call rotations. Go."
Station A — C3: Climate
Greenhouse effect,
feedback loops. Key Q: "Why does warming amplify itself?"
Station B — C4: Human Impact
Ocean chemistry,
biogeochemical cycles. Key Q: "How does human CO₂ change ocean pH?"
Station C — C5 W1: Air Masses
cP/mT
classification, front formation. Key Q: "What drives cP air southward
in winter?"
Station D — C5 W2: Prediction
Data patterns,
BWDA, weather vs. climate. Key Q: "What three data changes confirm
frontal passage?"
CIRCULATION:Listen for misconception traps: "cold air rises" / "weather =
climate" / "predictions are guesses" — redirect immediately with data
anchor.
SAY (DI Launch): "Stations done — back to
seats. Before tomorrow, let's lock in three key review points." [Present
key points. Students track on worksheet.]
Key Review Points: (1) Air mass classification: mT =
warm+humid (Gulf source), cT = warm+dry, mP = cold+humid, cP = cold+dry
(Canada). (2) Front formation: DENSITY drives interaction — cold air
wedges UNDER warm air (not "cold air rises"). (3) Data patterns: falling
pressure + SW→NW wind shift + temp drop = cold front passage.
Misconception Traps: "Cold air rises" ✗ — cold air
SINKS (denser). "Weather = Climate" ✗ — weather is short-term, climate =
30+ year average. "Predictions are guesses" ✗ — based on physics +
multi-source data.
SAY (Strategy Tip): "Tomorrow's
constructed-response questions ask you to EXPLAIN, PREDICT, ANALYZE, and
CREATE. Show your reasoning, not just your answer — use the sentence
starters on your worksheet. For multi-step questions, show intermediate
steps even if you're unsure."
SAY: "Questions about tomorrow's format?
[Answer briefly.] Remember: tomorrow is Day 2 — cumulative assessment,
then misconception check, then self-assessment. Bring your sharpest
thinking. Great work today." [Dismissal routine.]
TIMER: 5 minAttendance + silent start + assessment environment set
SAY (Opening): "Good morning scholars.
Chromebooks out but closed. Today is Day 2 — assessment day. No notes,
no partners once we begin. When I say go, open your Chromebook and
navigate to the student page. You'll work through three parts
independently. [Attendance.] Any questions before we begin? [Brief
pause.] Open Chromebooks — let's go."
SAY (Launch): "Open Form 4 — Cumulative
Assessment. 4 sections: A (Air Mass Interactions), B (Weather vs
Climate), C (Data Analysis), D (System Models). 35 minutes total. Work
independently. Sentence starters on your worksheet. Timer starts now."
Scan: Chromebook open + Form 4 visible + pencil moving. Any student on
wrong form → redirect quietly. Any student with head down → "Eyes on
screen, working."
AQ3 (4 pts): Uses at least one of:
maritime, continental, humidity, evaporation. Prompt if blank: "An air
mass over water is different because…"
DNPG AQ3 — IF blank:
Nothing written for AQ3.
"Write: 'An air mass over water is different because…' — one
sentence using 'evaporation' gets you started."
BQ3 (4 pts):
Must describe BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER phases. Prompt if only 1–2
phases: "Before the front arrives…"
CQ3 (4 pts): Identifies 2+ named
patterns with data evidence. "The patterns I see are…" starter.
DNPG CQ3 — IF only 1 pattern:
"Pressure is falling."
"Good — that's Pattern 1. Look at wind direction across the 3 time
points. What pattern do you see? That's Pattern 2."
DQ3 (4 pts):
Must show timing calculation: 80 mi ÷ 20 mph = 4 hrs. "My forecast
predicts…" starter used.
DQ4 (3 pts): Two valid atmospheric
reasons — NOT "forecaster made a mistake." Accept: unexpected storm
intensification, storm track error, model initialization error, local
moisture source, timing error.
RED FLAG DQ4:
"The meteorologist was wrong / made an error."
Do NOT correct during assessment — note name on P1 tracker. This
is the target red-flag response per Grading Notes.
SAY (@ ~35 min): "5 minutes remaining on
Part 2. Review your constructed responses — did you use sentence
starters and show your reasoning? Submit Form 4 when done."
SAY (Launch): "Form 4 submitted — now
open Form 3: Misconception Check. 4 misconception items, 15 minutes. For
each: identify if the statement is correct, THEN explain WHY using
evidence from our unit. Independent — no talking."
Misconception Targets — Track Persistence (P1 Tracker):
M1: Weather = Climate | M2: Cold air rises (SINKS — denser) | M3:
Seasons = distance from Sun (axial TILT) | M4: Predictions are guesses
(physics + multi-source data)
CIRCULATION:No intervention during Form 3. Observe and note which misconceptions
persist. Use P1 tracker for reteach planning.
SAY: "Form 3 submitted — last form. Open
Form 5: Standards Self-Assessment. 4 statements, rate your confidence.
This doesn't change your grade — it helps ME plan reteach. Honest
answers only. 5 minutes."
SAY:
EW "Station notes 'key insight'
box: ONE thing that changed your thinking this week. 1 minute." →
TT "Stem: 'My thinking changed
because I learned ___, which means ___.' Switch at 1 min." →
CC "[Name], how did YOUR
PARTNER's thinking change? [Follow-up:] Why was that important?"
SAY (Close): "Assessment complete.
[Affirm effort.] Scores returned within 48 hours — I'll grade
constructed responses first (Q2, Q4, Q5 in Part 1; A3, B3, C3, D3, D4 in
Part 2). Individual feedback on those items. Excellent work this cycle."
ARM 4
Note on P1 tracker: students who appeared significantly rushed,
blanked on constructed responses, or showed visible frustration →
candidates for Tier 2 follow-up before Cycle 6.
RED FLAG:
Student submitted Form 4 in under 10 min (5+ constructed
responses).
Note name on P1 tracker. Check auto-score in real-time if
possible. Priority for 1:1 reteach.
RED FLAGS BY QUESTION — Post-Assessment Quick Reference
(update from P1 tally after grading)
|
Question
|
Red Flag Response
|
Intervention
|
|
P1 Q2
|
No specific examples (vague connection)
|
Review air mass classification with data scenarios
|
|
P1 Q4
|
Lists steps without W1+W2 integration
|
Practice connecting W1 and W2 explicitly
|
|
P1 Q5
|
Misses wind shift significance
|
Review cold front signatures (BWDA)
|
|
Sec A Q3
|
Confuses maritime/continental labels
|
Review evaporation mechanism with source regions
|
|
Sec B Q3
|
Missing phase descriptions (only 1–2)
|
Review frontal passage BEFORE/DURING/AFTER timeline
|
|
Sec C Q3
|
Sees data points, not patterns
|
Practice trend identification across 3+ data points
|
|
Sec D Q3
|
Missing distance÷speed=time calculation
|
Review distance/speed/time framework
|
|
Sec D Q4
|
"The meteorologist made a mistake"
|
Reteach atmospheric limitations vs. human error
|
GRADING TIMELINE + C5 CROSS-GRADE SYNTHESIS
Grading Priority Order
-
P1 Q5 first — [INTEGRATION+SEP-4], highest DOK
- P1 Q2, Q4 — connection + process
- Form 4 Sec D Q3, Q4 — calculations
- Form 4 Sec A3, B3, C3 — explanation
- Form 3 — auto-graded (Misconception Check)
MTSS Triage
- Tier 1: 70–100% → monitor Cycle 6
- Tier 2: 50–69% → targeted reteach (peer pairs)
- Tier 3: 0–49% → modified materials + oral option
- 2 consecutive Tier 3 → MTSS alert
C5 Cross-Grade Synthesis (Mar 9–12)
All 4 grades are in C5 Week 3 simultaneously.
-
G5: Earth's sphere interactions + water cycle
(G7 explains the atmospheric dynamics driving G5's patterns)
-
G6: Cells & body systems homeostasis (G7
weather shapes G6 organisms' external conditions)
-
G8: Wave properties + info transfer (G8
explains the physics of tools G7 used to predict weather)
C5 energy chain: Solar radiation (G8 measures) → heats Earth
unevenly → drives G5 water cycle + G7 air masses → shapes G6
organisms' environment.
Vocab Boost (2 min):
- Read term + definition aloud.
- Student restates in own words.
- Use term in phenomenon sentence.
Concept Fix (3 min):
- "Some students think [X]."
- "What evidence contradicts this?"
- Guide to correct model via data.
Mechanism Bridge (3 min):
- "You know WHAT — now WHY?"
- Prompt cause-effect chain.
- Connect back to DQ.
KEPT RUBRIC — ASSESSMENT WEEK INDICATORS (90%+)
1 Content
Assessment aligned to MS-ESS2-5 (Primary) + ESS3-3/ESS3-5
(Spiral). All 8 manually graded items have rubric + exemplar
ready. Exemplar responses in P3–P4.
2 Culture
Assessment environment is calm, not punitive. Student names used
positively (not for compliance). Day 1 review stations feel
collaborative, not test-prep drill.
3 Facilitation
2/2/2 cycles executed on both days. Day 1 spiral station rotations
crisp (6 min each). Day 2 proctoring laps on 4-lap schedule with
DNPG coaching — not answers.
4 Ownership
Students self-assess via Form 5 (honest confidence ratings). Day 1
D&I prep frames assessment as skill demonstration, not test
performance. Student agency preserved throughout.
5 Data Driven
P1 tracker completed per period. 31 manually graded points scored
within 48 hrs. Misconception persistence tracked (M1–M4) from Form
3. MTSS tier recommendations to data meeting.
6 Beyond
Cross-grade synthesis surfaced (G5/G6/G7/G8 energy chain). Family
portal data entry within 48 hrs. Cycle 6 reteach plan drafted from
red-flag question data before next cycle begins.
DATA MEETING PREP — ASSESSMENT WEEK: Bring: (1) P1
tracker with student names flagged by period + misconception type. (2)
Form 2 + Form 4 manually graded scores (31 pts total). (3) Auto-score
summary from forms.gs (Forms 1, 3, 5). (4) Misconception persistence
count (M1–M4 from Form 3 per period). (5) MTSS tier movement
recommendations vs. Cycle 4–5 baseline. (6) Cycle 6 reteach priority
list — top 3 items by % missed.