Week 4: Conservation & Sustainability
Grade 7 Science | Rosche | Kairos Academies
Use these slides to review class content on your own. Navigate using the arrows or click to advance.
Year-End Integration Week Overview
This is the final week of 7th grade science! You'll show everything you've learned through four parts:
| Part | Focus | Points | Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Cycle 8 Synthesis | Connect ecosystem concepts from this cycle | 25 pts | Day 1 |
| Part 2: Investigation Presentation | Present your ecosystem investigation | 35 pts | Day 2 |
| Part 3: CCC Synthesis | Apply all 7 Cross-Cutting Concepts | 25 pts | Day 3 |
| Part 4: Reflection | Growth mindset, science identity, favorite moments | 15 pts | Days 4-5 |
Part 1: Cycle 8 Synthesis 25 pts
What You'll Do
Connect the big ideas from Cycle 8: trophic cascades, biodiversity, and climate impacts on ecosystems.
Ecosystem Connections
Producers → Primary Consumers → Secondary Consumers → Decomposers
Remove one species and the whole web can change!
| Week | Topic | Key Concept |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Trophic Cascades | Removing predators causes ripple effects through whole ecosystems |
| Week 2 | Biodiversity & Resilience | More diverse ecosystems recover better from disturbances |
| Week 3 | Climate Impacts | Climate change shifts where species live, when events happen, and ecosystem health |
Synthesis Questions
- How can removing one species affect an entire ecosystem? (Think: Yellowstone wolves)
- Why are biodiverse ecosystems more resilient to change?
- Why are coral reefs struggling even in protected areas?
Need help connecting concepts?
Think about the Yellowstone example:
- Wolves removed → elk population increased → overgrazing
- Trees and shrubs declined → erosion increased → rivers changed course
- Wolves returned → elk behavior changed → vegetation recovered
One species can affect the entire ecosystem!
Part 1 Form
[EMBED G7.C8.W4 Part 1 Form Here]
Part 2: Investigation Presentation 35 pts
What You'll Do
Present the ecosystem investigation you prepared in Week 3. This is your chance to share what you found!
Presentation Requirements (4-5 minutes)
Include These Elements
- Research Question: What ecosystem question did you investigate?
- Evidence: What data and sources support your findings?
- Scientific Principles: What ecological concepts help explain your findings?
- CCC Connection: Which cross-cutting concepts connect most to your topic?
Investigation Topics
- Local ecosystem case study
- Endangered species analysis
- Climate impact on a specific biome
- Conservation success or failure story
- Invasive species effects
Presentation Rubric
| Criteria | Excellent (8-9) | Proficient (6-7) | Developing (4-5) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Accuracy | Correct, complete information | Mostly accurate | Some errors |
| Evidence Use | Strong, varied sources | Adequate evidence | Limited evidence |
| CCC Application | Clear, insightful connections | Adequate connection | Weak connection |
| Communication | Clear, engaging, professional | Clear and organized | Needs improvement |
Scientist Spotlight: Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer
Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer is a botanist, ecologist, and member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation. She connects Western science with Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK). Her work shows that these two ways of knowing can—and must—work together to protect biodiversity and restore ecosystems.
Background & Education
Kimmerer grew up in upstate New York. She felt connected to both her Potawatomi heritage and the forests around her. She earned her PhD in botany from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1983). Now she is a Distinguished Teaching Professor at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. She also founded the Center for Native Peoples and the Environment. This center trains indigenous students in both Western science and TEK.
Groundbreaking Work: Blending Science & Indigenous Wisdom
- Moss Ecology Research: Kimmerer is one of the world's top experts on bryophytes (mosses). Her research shows how mosses create microhabitats needed for forest biodiversity. Mosses act as ecosystem engineers, like the keystone species you studied in Week 1! She studies mosses through microscopes AND through her Potawatomi elders' teachings about how mosses help water cycles and forest health.
- "Braiding Sweetgrass" (2013): This book changed how people think about humans and nature. The Western view sees humans as separate from nature. Kimmerer teaches the indigenous idea of "all my relations." In this view, humans, plants, animals, rocks, and water are all connected family. The book sold over 1 million copies. It stayed on the New York Times bestseller list for over 100 weeks.
- Restoration Ecology: Kimmerer's research mixes Western ecological methods (population surveys, experimental plots) with indigenous practices (controlled burns, selective harvesting, ceremony). Together, these methods restore damaged ecosystems. Her work shows that ecosystems managed with TEK often have HIGHER biodiversity than Western "hands-off" conservation approaches.
See the conservation justice section below. Kimmerer's work offers a different path than "fortress conservation" (pushing indigenous peoples off their lands). She calls for reciprocal restoration—healing both the land AND the bond between indigenous communities and their ancestral territories.
Key Concepts from Kimmerer's Work
The Honorable Harvest
Indigenous rules for sustainable resource use (connects to ecosystem services from Week 2!):
- Ask permission before taking from nature
- Take only what you need, never more than half
- Use everything you take (minimize waste)
- Give thanks and give back to the Earth
- Share what you harvest with others
- Sustain the ones who sustain you—protect ecosystems for future generations
Compare this to modern industrial harvesting (clearcutting forests, overfishing, using up resources). Which approach keeps biodiversity and resilience (Week 2 focus)?
Why Kimmerer's Work Matters for YOU
- Multiple Ways of Knowing: You don't have to choose between science and other knowledge systems. They can work together. Kimmerer shows that combining TEK + Western science leads to better conservation results.
- Relationship with Nature: Western science often treats nature as "resources" to study and manage. Indigenous science treats nature as relatives to care for. This change in viewpoint shapes how we approach conservation.
- Women & Indigenous Scientists: Kimmerer faced barriers as both a woman and an indigenous person in science. Her success shows that diverse perspectives strengthen science.
- Science Communication: Like Dr. Hayhoe (Week 3), Kimmerer is great at sharing science through stories. "Braiding Sweetgrass" teaches ecology through indigenous stories. It reaches millions who might never read a scientific paper.
- Hope & Action: During this time of environmental crisis, Kimmerer offers hope. She shows that humans can have positive relationships with ecosystems, not just harmful ones. Her work inspires people to ACT for conservation.
"The land knows you, even when you are lost." - Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer
Kimmerer teaches that ecosystems aren't just things we study. They're communities we belong to. How might this idea change your approach to ecosystem restoration (the topic of your presentations this week)?
Awards & Recognition
- MacArthur Fellowship "Genius Grant" (2022) - $625,000 award for groundbreaking work
- John Burroughs Medal for nature writing (2014)
- Sigurd Olson Nature Writing Award (2013)
- Named one of TIME's 100 Most Influential People (2023)
- Honorary doctorates from 5+ universities for her work in ecology and indigenous knowledge
Missouri Indigenous Peoples & Ecosystem Stewardship
The conservation justice section below covers national and global patterns. But first, learn about the indigenous peoples who managed Missouri ecosystems for thousands of years before European colonization. Their removal changed the ecosystems you've studied this cycle.
Indigenous Nations of Missouri (Pre-1800s)
| Nation | Territory | Ecosystem Management Practices | What Happened After Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osage Nation | Central/Western Missouri (tallgrass prairies, river valleys) | Controlled burns kept prairie ecosystems healthy; bison management; seasonal hunting/gathering rotation stopped overuse | Fire suppression → woody encroachment (cedar, eastern red cedar invasion) → prairie loss; 99% of tallgrass prairie turned into farmland → loss of biodiversity hotspot |
| Missouria (Missouri) Tribe | Missouri River valley (state's namesake) | Floodplain farming mixed with wild harvest; seasonal migration; used fire to keep prairie-forest mosaic | Levees + channelization → natural flood cycles lost; wetland drainage → fewer waterfowl and fish |
| Kickapoo Tribe | Northern/Central Missouri (forests and prairies) | Sustainable forestry (selective harvest); fire management; grew medicinal plants alongside wild harvest | Clearcutting replaced selective harvest → forests broke down; trees lost their mix of ages → wildlife habitat shrank |
| Illini Confederacy | Northeast Missouri (Mississippi River floodplain) | Floodplain management; mound-building made diverse habitats; sustainable fishing and shellfish harvest | Levee construction → cut off floodplain from river → loss of rich bottomland forests; mussel populations crashed |
St. Louis-Area Indigenous History
Osage, Missouria & Illini Peoples
Before St. Louis existed, the area where the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers meet was home to several indigenous nations:
- Population (pre-contact): About 10,000-15,000 people lived in the greater St. Louis region. It was a major trading center for thousands of years.
- Ecosystem management: They managed river bottomlands with controlled flooding and fire. They fished and harvested mussels from both rivers. They kept prairie-forest edges that supported bison, elk, deer, and many bird species. Cahokia Mounds (across the river in Illinois) was the largest pre-Columbian city north of Mexico (20,000+ people by 1200 CE).
- Displacement timeline: French colonization (1700s), American expansion (Louisiana Purchase 1803), and the Indian Removal Act (1830s) forced most indigenous peoples west by 1850. The Osage Nation was moved to Kansas, then Oklahoma by the 1870s.
- Ecological consequences: Without controlled burning, eastern red cedar took over prairies. River management practices were lost. Levees made flooding worse. Mussels were overharvested for the button industry (1890s-1940s). Populations collapsed. Missouri lost 1/3 of its mussel species to extinction.
What Traditional Ecological Knowledge Could Teach Missouri Today
As you plan ecosystem restoration (Part 2 presentations this week), think about how indigenous practices could guide today's conservation efforts:
- Fire Management: Osage controlled burns kept prairie ecosystems healthy and stopped woody encroachment. Eastern red cedar invasion is now Missouri's #1 grassland threat. The Missouri Department of Conservation now uses "prescribed burns" based on indigenous practices.
- Floodplain Management: Missouria and Illini peoples worked WITH floods, not against them. Seasonal flooding fed nutrients to bottomland forests. Modern levees cut off rivers from floodplains. This made floods worse (1993, 2019) and hurt ecosystems.
- Biodiversity Maintenance: Indigenous peoples actively CREATED biodiversity through varied land management. This is the opposite of "wilderness without people" conservation. Research shows indigenous-managed lands often have MORE species diversity than state-run protected areas.
- Climate Resilience: Indigenous practices like controlled burns, selective forestry, and prairie-forest mosaics built ecosystems that could handle drought, flood, and climate swings. This matters even more as climate change gets worse (Week 3!).
Indigenous-Led Conservation in Missouri Today
Current Initiatives
- Osage Nation Partnerships: The Osage Nation was removed to Oklahoma. But they still work with the Missouri Department of Conservation on tallgrass prairie restoration in their ancestral lands. They share fire management knowledge and help find culturally important plant species.
- Sac and Fox Nation: They work with conservation groups to bring bison back to Missouri prairies. Bison were keystone species (Week 1!). Indigenous peoples managed them for thousands of years before they were wiped out in the 1800s. Small herds now live at Prairie State Park and Dunn Ranch Prairie.
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma: They advise on forest management in Mark Twain National Forest (their ancestral territory). They help with sustainable harvest practices and finding medicinal plant populations.
- Collaborative Management: The Missouri Department of Conservation works more and more with tribal nations on ecosystem management for state lands. They see that indigenous knowledge adds to Western science.
Call to Action: Acknowledge & Respect
- Learn whose land you're on: Use resources like native-land.ca to find out which indigenous peoples cared for the land where you live. St. Louis sits on Osage, Missouria, and Illini ancestral territories. It is also across the river from Cahokia Mounds, the largest pre-Columbian city north of Mexico.
- Support indigenous-led conservation: When you can, back groups led by indigenous communities instead of outside groups forcing conservation plans on them.
- Recognize TEK as Science: Traditional Ecological Knowledge isn't "folklore." It is detailed, evidence-based knowledge built over thousands of years. Respect it as a real scientific approach.
- Question Conservation Stories: When you hear about "pristine wilderness" or "untouched nature," ask: Who was removed to create this "wilderness"? Were indigenous peoples pushed out?
- Speak Up for Co-Management: Support plans where indigenous communities share decision-making power in conservation. They should be equal partners, not just asked for input.
Critical Perspective: Conservation Justice
Before we talk about ecosystem restoration, we need to face an uncomfortable truth: Many protected areas—including famous national parks—were created by forcing indigenous peoples off their ancestral lands.
The Historical Pattern
In the 1800s-1900s, conservation often meant "wilderness without people." National parks in the United States, Africa, and elsewhere were set up by removing native communities. These groups had lived sustainably on those lands for thousands of years.
- Yellowstone National Park (1872): Created after removing the Shoshone, Bannock, and Crow peoples. They had managed those lands for over 10,000 years.
- Yosemite National Park (1890): Set up by removing the Ahwahneechee people. They had shaped the valley's ecology through controlled burning.
- African Protected Areas: In the 1900s, over 14 million people were moved to create parks and reserves across Africa.
This "fortress conservation" model assumed indigenous peoples hurt nature. The opposite was often true.
The Data: Who Protects Ecosystems Better?
| Management Type | Deforestation Rate | Biodiversity Outcomes | Carbon Storage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indigenous-Managed Lands | 0.6% loss (2000-2012) | High species richness; traditional practices keep habitat diversity | ~300 billion tons C stored globally |
| State-Managed Protected Areas | 1.2% loss (2000-2012) | Mixed results; some parks struggle with poaching and damage | Large but dropping in some regions |
| Unprotected Lands | 3.5% loss (2000-2012) | Rapid biodiversity decline | Major carbon source due to deforestation |
Why Indigenous Conservation Works
Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK)
Indigenous communities have built detailed ecological knowledge over thousands of years:
- Fire Management: Controlled burns prevent huge wildfires and help ecosystem diversity. California indigenous practices cut megafire risk by 80-90%.
- Sustainable Harvest: Traditional fishing, hunting, and gathering practices keep populations healthy instead of using them up.
- Species Monitoring: Watching nature across many generations spots small ecosystem changes faster than short-term scientific studies.
- Sacred Site Protection: Cultural rules protect key habitats (spawning grounds, old-growth forests) without needing police or rangers.
Western science now sees more and more that indigenous knowledge adds to, and sometimes beats, standard conservation science.
Real-World Example: Amazon Co-Management Success
Kayapó Indigenous Territory (Brazil): 10.6 million hectares managed by Kayapó people
- Outcome: Only 1.4% deforestation (2000-2012). Nearby non-indigenous areas lost 20-50%.
- Method: Community forest monitoring, sustainable Brazil nut harvesting, cultural fire management
- Benefit: Stores ~2.4 billion tons of CO2. That equals all U.S. emissions for 4 months.
- Social Impact: Kayapó communities support themselves through sustainable resources. No one was forced to leave.
The Path Forward: Co-Management Models
Conservation WITH Communities, Not Against Them
Modern conservation is moving from shutting people out to working together:
- Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs): Laws now recognize indigenous-managed lands as conservation areas. Australia and Canada lead this approach.
- Co-Management Agreements: Indigenous communities and government agencies share decisions together. One example is the Great Bear Rainforest in British Columbia.
- Land Rights Recognition: When indigenous peoples have secure land rights, they invest more in conservation and long-term care.
- Benefit Sharing: If conservation earns money (ecotourism, carbon credits), communities get fair payment.
- Knowledge Integration: Joining TEK with Western science for adaptive management.
What This Means for YOU as a Scientist
- Who lived on this land before it was "protected"? Were they displaced?
- Are local and indigenous communities part of conservation planning and management?
- Does the conservation project respect indigenous rights and knowledge?
- Are benefits shared fairly, or do outsiders profit while communities lose access?
- Can traditional ecological practices be included in restoration plans?
Good science includes social justice. Ecosystem restoration that ignores people's rights and knowledge is not ethical or sustainable. The best conservation projects partner with—not shut out—the communities who have cared for these lands for thousands of years.
Call to Action
As you think about ecosystem restoration and conservation (Part 3), consider:
- How can restoration plans include indigenous ecological knowledge?
- Who should make decisions about land management, and why?
- What does "sustainable" mean if it displaces the people who sustained the ecosystem for thousands of years?
- How can conservation projects benefit both ecosystems AND the people who depend on them?
Want to learn more about conservation justice?
Explore these resources:
- Book: "Braiding Sweetgrass" by Robin Wall Kimmerer (Potawatomi botanist mixing indigenous knowledge and Western science)
- Research: "Indigenous peoples and local communities protect more biodiversity than managed protected areas" (Nature Sustainability, 2021)
- Documentary: "Gather" (2020) - Indigenous food sovereignty and ecological restoration
- Organization: Indigenous Environmental Network - grassroots indigenous-led conservation
- Movement: Land Back - returning indigenous lands and management rights
Conservation science is changing to focus on justice, fairness, and indigenous leadership. You can be part of this change.
Part 3: CCC Year-End Synthesis 25 pts
What You'll Do
Apply all 7 Cross-Cutting Concepts to a new scenario: The Rainforest Restoration Challenge
The 7 Cross-Cutting Concepts
1Patterns
Observed patterns help us group things and make predictions
2Cause & Effect
We look for what causes things to happen and why
3Scale, Proportion, Quantity
Looking at different sizes shows different patterns
4Systems & System Models
Parts work together within set boundaries
5Energy & Matter
We track how they move through systems
6Structure & Function
Shape and structure control what something does
7Stability & Change
Conditions can stay the same, change, or repeat in cycles
The Rainforest Restoration Challenge
Scenario
Logging and farming have damaged a tropical rainforest. Scientists are planning to restore it. Apply each CCC to study this challenge:
- Patterns: What patterns in species recovery and succession do we see?
- Cause & Effect: What caused the degradation? What will restoration cause?
- Scale: How do effects differ from individual trees to regional climate?
- Systems: How does the rainforest work as a connected ecosystem?
- Energy & Matter: How do energy and nutrients flow through the food web?
- Structure & Function: How do forest layers and species adaptations help organisms survive?
- Stability & Change: How stable will the restored ecosystem be over time?
Need help applying CCCs?
Think about your year: You've used these CCCs in every cycle! They're the "thinking tools" that connect all of science.
- Cycle 1-2: Energy patterns and cause/effect
- Cycle 3: Natural selection and stability/change
- Cycle 4: Ecosystems as systems, energy flow
- Cycle 5-6: Waves and forces, structure/function
- Cycle 7: Earth history patterns, scale
- Cycle 8: Ecosystem stability and change
Part 3 Form
[EMBED G7.C8.W4 Part 3 Form Here]
Part 4: Year-End Reflection 15 pts
What You'll Do
Think about your growth as a scientist this year. This is about celebrating YOU!
Growth Mindset Reflection (5 pts)
- What was your biggest scientific challenge this year? How did you overcome it?
- What mistake or failure taught you the most?
- How did your approach to scientific thinking change?
Science Identity (5 pts)
- When did you feel most like a scientist this year?
- What science topic or investigation interested you most?
- How might you use science skills in your future?
Favorite Learning Moments (5 pts)
- Most surprising discovery you made
- Best collaborative science experience
- Investigation you're most proud of
Need help with reflections?
Sentence starters:
- "At the beginning of the year, I thought... but now I know..."
- "The hardest thing was... and I overcame it by..."
- "I felt like a scientist when..."
- "Something that surprised me was..."
Part 4 Form
[EMBED G7.C8.W4 Part 4 Form Here]
Day 5: Science Celebration!
- Science Showcase - display your best work from the year
- Gallery walk - see what your classmates accomplished
- Recognition ceremony - celebrating achievements
- Closing circle - sharing favorite science moments
- Preview of 8th grade science!
Recognition Categories
- Discovery Award: Best scientific observation
- Persistence Award: Overcame big learning challenges
- Collaboration Award: Best team contributor
- Curiosity Award: Asked the best questions
- Growth Award: Showed the most growth in scientific thinking
Study Resources
Key Vocabulary Review
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Trophic cascade | Ripple effects through a food web when a top predator is removed or added |
| Biodiversity | Variety of life in an ecosystem |
| Ecosystem resilience | Ability of an ecosystem to recover from disturbance |
| Keystone species | A species that has an extra-large effect on its ecosystem |
| Food web | Complex network of feeding relationships |
| Climate adaptation | Ways organisms change to survive climate change |
Practice These Vocabulary Terms
Need intensive support?
Support options you can use:
- Presentation coaching before Day 2
- Modified CCC synthesis (focus on 3-4 CCCs)
- Scribed reflections if needed
- One-on-one support during any part
- Modified presentation length (3 min)
Talk to your teacher if you need extra help.
Worked Example
Step-by-Step Problem Solving
Problem Scenario
Review the problem scenario and work through each step below.
Enrichment & Extension
Optional deep dives for early finishers.
Optional content if you finish early or want to go deeper.
Scientist Spotlight
Research a scientist who contributed to this week's topic area and describe their key findings.
Environmental Justice Connection
Explore how this week's science concepts connect to environmental justice issues in our community.
Week 4 Complete!
Great work exploring Conservation & Sustainability this week!