Week 3: Radiometric Dating & Absolute Age

Grade 7 Science | Rosche

MS-ESS1-4 Construct a scientific explanation based on evidence from rock strata for how the geologic time scale is used to organize Earth's 4.6-billion-year-old history.

Text-to-Speech: Chrome (Right-click → "Read aloud") | Edge (Icon in address bar)
Need Support?: Look for green and red "Hint" and "Walkthrough" boxes!

The Phenomenon: Radiometric Dating & Absolute Age

Anchoring Context & Focus Question

How can scientists determine the age of a dinosaur bone?

Radioactive decay timeline: five snapshots of a 16-atom sample across four half-lives. Parent (red) halves each step β€” 100% β†’ 50% β†’ 25% β†’ 12.5% β†’ 6.25%; daughter (gray) accumulates correspondingly.
Each step halves the remaining parent β€” preview the decay process before the station activities.
Animated explanation of the week's focus question. Watch then reason about why this happens.
Key Vocabulary (10 terms) — Practice Tool

Cognate Strategy: Many science words look similar in English and Spanish β€” use your Spanish to learn science!

Term Spanish Definition
intrusive igneous ignea intrusiva Rock formed from slow cooling underground with large crystals
extrusive igneous ignea extrusiva Rock formed from fast cooling at surface with small crystals
trace fossil fosil de traza Evidence of organism activity like footprints or burrows
body fossil fΓ³sil corporal Actual organism remains like bones, shells, and teeth
radiometric dating datacion radiometrica Dating rocks using radioactive decay rates
half-life vida media Time for half of radioactive isotope to decay
parent isotope isotopo progenitor Original radioactive element before decay
daughter isotope isotopo producto Product of radioactive decay
absolute dating datacion absoluta Determining actual age in years using radiometric methods
geologic time scale escala de tiempo geologico Division of Earth history into eons, eras, periods, epochs

Hook – Radiometric Dating & Absolute Age

Engage with the phenomenon for Radiometric Dating & Absolute Age.

Side-by-side comparison: Γ–tzi the Iceman (5,300 yr, Carbon-14) vs. Tyrannosaurus rex (67 My, Uranium-Lead). Two isotope tools for two vastly different age scales.
12,000Γ— difference in age β€” same logic, different isotope half-life.

How Old Is That Bone?

In 1991, hikers in the Alps discovered a frozen human body later named "Γ–tzi the Iceman." Scientists used radiometric dating β€” measuring how much carbon-14 remained in his body β€” to determine he died approximately 5,300 years ago. For a dinosaur bone, which is far too old for carbon-14, scientists use uranium-238 instead, whose half-life is 4.5 billion years. These techniques give scientists the precise, absolute ages that the Law of Superposition alone cannot provide.

Week 2 Connection

Last week you used relative dating β€” determining which layers and fossils are older or younger without knowing the exact year. This week you add absolute dating (dataciΓ³n absoluta) to your toolkit: using radioactive decay rates to calculate actual numbers of years. Together, relative and absolute dating give geologists the complete picture of Earth's timeline.

What You'll Do

  1. Learn how radioactive decay works through a half-life simulation
  2. Calculate ages of rock and bone samples using decay equations
  3. Choose the correct isotope for different age ranges (carbon-14 vs. uranium-238)
  4. Connect absolute dates back to the geologic time scale from Week 2
  5. Evaluate real radiometric dating data from a Missouri fossil site
COMPLETE THE HOOK FORM

Hook activity for Radiometric Dating & Absolute Age.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Worked Example – Calculating Absolute Age with Half-Life

Half-life decay curve: % parent isotope vs number of half-lives. 100 β†’ 50 β†’ 25 β†’ 12.5 β†’ 6.25%.
Each half-life halves the remaining parent β€” the curve never reaches zero.

Worked Example: Calculating Absolute Age with Half-Life

Problem: A geologist tests a piece of wood from an archaeological site in Missouri. The sample originally contained 100% carbon-14. Today it contains only 12.5% of its original carbon-14. Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5,730 years. How old is this wood?

Step 1: Count the Half-Lives

Each half-life cuts the remaining parent isotope in half:

Start: 100% β†’ after 1 half-life: 50% β†’ after 2 half-lives: 25% β†’ after 3 half-lives: 12.5%

The sample has gone through 3 half-lives to reach 12.5%.

Step 2: Multiply to Get Years

3 half-lives Γ— 5,730 years/half-life = 17,190 years old

This wood is approximately 17,190 years old β€” from the last Ice Age, when mastodons still roamed Missouri.

Step 3: Choose the Right Isotope

Carbon-14 only works for materials up to ~50,000 years old (it fully decays after about 9 half-lives, leaving too little to measure). For a dinosaur bone (66+ million years old), scientists use uranium-238 (half-life: 4.5 billion years), which is still measurable in ancient rock. Always match the isotope to the age range of your sample.
πŸ”¬ Interactive Simulator β€” Half-Life Simulator
↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Station 1 – Half-Life Simulation

Model radioactive decay using a half-life simulation and calculate sample ages.

Half-life simulation: 4 rows of 16 atoms. Each row halves the parent (red) count: 16 β†’ 8 β†’ 4 β†’ 2; daughter (blue) rises to compensate.
Half-life simulation β€” parent halves each step; daughter rises.

Station 1 β€” Half-Life Simulation

Use the interactive half-life simulation to model radioactive decay. You will adjust the starting amount of a parent isotope and observe how the parent (original radioactive element) decreases while the daughter isotope (decay product) increases over time. This simulates exactly what happens inside a rock or fossil after it forms β€” the isotope clock starts ticking the moment the rock solidifies.

Data Collection β€” Record in the Form

  1. Run the simulation for 5 half-lives and record the % parent remaining after each half-life in the data table
  2. Describe the pattern you observe: is decay linear or curved?
  3. Given a sample with 25% parent isotope remaining and a half-life of 10,000 years β€” calculate its age using the worked example method
  4. Explain in your own words: why does the percentage of parent isotope never actually reach 0%?
COMPLETE THE STATION 1 FORM

Model radioactive decay and calculate ages from half-life data.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Station 2 – Isotope Selection & Age Calculation

Choose the correct isotope for different fossil ages and calculate absolute dates.

Logarithmic timescale ruler showing useful age ranges of Carbon-14, Potassium-Argon, and Uranium-Lead against sample types from a 1,200-year wooden tool to a 3-billion-year-old lava flow.
Match the isotope tool to the sample's age β€” C-14 fails for dinosaurs.

Station 2 β€” Isotope Selection & Age Calculation

You are given a set of five samples from Missouri field sites β€” ranging from a campfire charcoal to a granite boulder from the Ozarks. For each sample, you must select the correct radiometric dating isotope and calculate an estimated age from the given decay data. Then you will place each sample on the geologic time scale to connect absolute dates to the eras and periods you mapped in Week 2.

Isotope Reference Card

  1. Carbon-14 / Carbono-14: Half-life 5,730 years β€” use for organic materials up to ~50,000 years old
  2. Potassium-40: Half-life 1.25 billion years β€” use for volcanic rocks 100,000 to 4 billion years old
  3. Uranium-238 / Uranio-238: Half-life 4.5 billion years β€” use for very ancient rocks and zircon crystals

For each sample: (a) state which isotope you would use and why, (b) calculate the absolute age from the given % remaining, (c) name the geologic era when this sample formed.
COMPLETE THE STATION 2 FORM

Match isotopes to sample age ranges and calculate absolute dates.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Station 3 – Constructing Earth's Timeline

Combine relative and absolute dating to build a complete Earth history timeline.

Earth 4.6 Gy history to scale showing major events: Hadean, Archean, Proterozoic, Phanerozoic eras and key events from Earth formation to modern humans appearing in the last 0.04 mm.
To-scale Earth timeline β€” humans take the last 0.04 mm.

Station 3 β€” Constructing Earth's Complete Timeline

Now you have both tools β€” relative dating from Week 2 and absolute dating from this week. Your challenge: take a set of Missouri rock and fossil evidence cards and arrange them on a complete geologic timeline that shows both the order of events (relative) and their actual ages in years (absolute). You will create a geologic history of Missouri from 1.5 billion years ago to the present.

Missouri Evidence to Place

  1. Taum Sauk rhyolite β€” uranium-238 data indicates ~1.47 billion years ago (Proterozoic)
  2. St. Louis limestone with brachiopod fossils β€” 300–340 million years ago (Mississippian Period)
  3. Dinosaur trackway near Glen Allen β€” 100–120 million years ago (Cretaceous, Mesozoic)
  4. Mastodon teeth from Kimmswick site β€” carbon-14 data indicates ~11,000–13,000 years ago (Pleistocene, Cenozoic)

CER: Defending an Age Claim

Write a CER response: "Why is radiometric dating considered more reliable for absolute ages than relative dating alone?" Include at least one specific Missouri example from your timeline as evidence.
COMPLETE THE STATION 3 FORM

Combine relative and absolute dating methods to construct Earth's timeline.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Exit Ticket – Radiometric Dating Integration

Synthesize learning about radiometric dating and absolute age.

Synthesis diagram: relative dating (superposition, index fossils, W2) plus absolute dating (radiometric, W3) combine to produce the full geologic time scale.
Relative + absolute = the dated geologic time scale.

Exit Ticket β€” Absolute Dating Mastery

Demonstrate your understanding of radiometric dating through 2 new-content questions about half-life calculations and isotope selection, 2 spiral questions that connect back to Week 2 relative dating and the geologic time scale, and 1 integration question that combines radiometric data with the SEP practice of using mathematics and computational thinking to determine the absolute age of a Missouri fossil sample.

COMPLETE THE EXIT TICKET

Demonstrate mastery of radiometric dating and absolute age concepts.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Enrichment & Extension
Optional content if you finish early or want to go deeper.

Scientist Spotlight: Willard Libby

Willard Libby (1908–1980) was an American chemist who invented radiocarbon dating (carbon-14 dating) in 1949. While a professor at the University of Chicago, Libby realized that living organisms continuously absorb carbon-14 from the atmosphere β€” and that the moment an organism dies, the clock starts: carbon-14 begins decaying at a known, constant rate. By measuring how much carbon-14 remains in organic material, scientists can calculate when the organism died. Libby won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1960 for this discovery, which transformed archaeology, geology, and paleontology overnight. His technique directly answered the question of this week: how old is that bone? Libby's method has since been used to date mummies, ancient wood beams, cave paintings, and even the Shroud of Turin. Like all good science, carbon-14 dating was tested, calibrated, and improved by thousands of scientists who came after him.

Environmental Justice: Radioactive Waste and Deep Time

Uranium-238 has a half-life of 4.5 billion years β€” roughly the age of Earth itself. When nuclear power plants and weapons programs produce radioactive waste, scientists must think in geologic time to answer a frightening question: how do we store something dangerous for longer than human civilization has existed? The proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository in Nevada is designed to contain waste for 10,000 years. But some waste products, like plutonium-239 (half-life 24,000 years), remain hazardous far longer. Communities near nuclear waste sites β€” like the communities along Coldwater Creek and near West Lake Landfill in St. Louis β€” bear a disproportionate share of this risk. Understanding half-lives and decay rates is not just a classroom exercise: it is fundamental to knowing how long contamination persists and how urgently cleanup must occur. This is why geologists, not just politicians, must be part of environmental justice decisions.

↑ Top of Section ↑ Back to Navigation

Week 3 Complete!

Next Week: Synthesis & Assessment β€” bring together everything from the rock cycle, geologic time, and radiometric dating.